# Monday, September 17, 2007

I installed Windows XP Professional with SP 2 today and was amazed to see this when I ran Windows Update:

Windows XP - 96 Updates

96 updates!

It literally took longer to install all the Windows XP updates than it did to install Visual Studio 2005 Team Developer Edition.  Amazing!

Maybe it's time for SP 3?

posted on Monday, September 17, 2007 2:34:09 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] Trackback
# Saturday, August 18, 2007

One of the first things I do after installing Vista is turn off UAC (ooh, I can already feel the criticism).  I just can abide having to authorize every single action I take on the computer.  It's one thing to ask me to confirm a change to IIS or a service running on my machine, but don't make me authorize the deletion of files on the operating system!  If I clicked delete and confirmed the deletion, just delete it!

Previously, if you wanted to add a network printer that ran on Windows XP or 2003, you had to have UAC turned on.  This means that I would have to turn on UAC, reboot my machine, add the printer, turn off UAC, and then reboot my machine again.  Just to add a printer.  Brilliant!

Fortunately Microsoft just released two updates:

The first of the two specifically addresses the following "issue":

If User Account Control is disabled on the computer, you cannot install a network printer successfully. This problem occurs if the network printer is hosted by a Windows XP-based or a Windows Server 2003-based computer.

Finally!

To test this, I installed both updates (rebooting after each on), and then attempted to add a network printer.  Previously, clicking the Install driver button caused failed if UAC was turned off.

Adding a network printer in Vista

After installing the updates, however, it works exactly as one would expect it to work.

It only took six or seven months, but it seems this annoying "issue" was finally resolved.  Thank goodness!

posted on Saturday, August 18, 2007 10:24:29 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] Trackback

As those of you who subscribe to this blog's feed have noticed, a place holder record was written into my RSS feed.  Having just reinstalled my operating system (I have switched back to Vista Business once again), I was configuring my Windows Live Writer for this blog.  If you click View --> Update Weblog Style you will be asked the following:

Allow Writer to Create a Temporary Post?

Just say No!

If you click Yes it will post the following placeholder on your blog.  And, while it is able to delete it successfully (meaning it won't show up when you browse your blog), you will have problems getting it out of your RSS feed.

This is a temporary post that was not deleted. Please delete this manually. (79142faa-4883-4d2a-bb80-daabb3ef865c)

Pretty annoying.  I'm still trying to figure out how to get rid of it.  It no longer exists in my blogs contents, yet I can't seem to get it out of my feed (which is managed by Feedburner).

I'll post an update if I figure it out.

Just be warned!!

posted on Saturday, August 18, 2007 10:06:20 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] Trackback
# Saturday, July 14, 2007

I was performing an advanced search on Google Blog Search (posts that include "commerce server 2007" over the past week) when allow of a sudden I started getting the following error:

We're sorry ... but your query looks similar to automated requests from a computer virus or spyware application

Que?!  What is it with me and search engines?!

Something very similar happened awhile back when I was searching Yahoo.  I got the infamous "error 999", which evidently is most often caused by bandwidth limiting that Yahoo! invokes to prevent DoS (Denial of Service) attacks and automated processes that overload their systems.

Come on now, is it too much to be able to perform some advanced searches?  While I wasn't surprised to see this happen with Yahoo!, I've come to expect more from Google.

Sheesh!

posted on Saturday, July 14, 2007 7:33:11 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] Trackback
# Thursday, June 14, 2007

... and here's a good reason why:

Every time I attempt to search, I get the error "Sorry, Unable to process request at this time -- error 999."  This has been occurring for at least the past 30 minutes.  However, I pinged a friend of mine, Brad Younge, and he can search just fine.  Quite strange!

A quick search via Google (and no, I've never received an "unable to process request at this time" error from Google) shows that a LOT of people have this problem.

So, I can safely say that no, I don't Yahoo!.

Anyone know why this happens?

[Update]

I found an excellent description of this error on Murray's Binary Bit Bucket.  It appears that the most common reason for this error is some sort of bandwidth limiting that Yahoo! put in place on their servers.  The idea is to prevent both DoS (Denial of Service) attacks and automated processes that would pummel their servers with requests.

Wonder why it targeted me?

[Update 2]

About an hour after posting I can now search again.  We'll see if I can purposely cause this to occur again!!

[Update 3]

Yep, I was able to purposely cause Yahoo! to prevent my from issuing searches.  I wrote a little application that does the following:

string url = "http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=wade+wegner&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8";
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
{
   HttpWebRequest request = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create(url);
   request.Method = "GET";
   request.AllowAutoRedirect = false;
   request.Proxy = WebProxy.GetDefaultProxy();
   request.Proxy.Credentials = System.Net.CredentialCache.DefaultCredentials;
   WebResponse response = request.GetResponse();
}

So, evidently Yahoo! doesn't appreciate it if you make 1000 calls in a short period of time.  Interesting!

posted on Thursday, June 14, 2007 4:09:41 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] Trackback